History, politics, people of Oly WA

Category: Olympia (Page 12 of 13)

On “The hippest town in the West”

I’ve been burning annual leave for the last week, so in addition to Christmas, I’ve been thinking longer about things that I usually spare just a bit of time for.

One if the phrase “hippest town in the West,” which has cursed Olympia since it was written by Benjamin Nugent almost eight years ago.

A few facts:

1. Ben wasn’t compiling a list of hip western towns, on which list Olympia came first. This wasn’t like the most livable cities list or the most reading cities. This was almost a throw-away article about Sleater Kinney and the indi-rock scene in Olympia. This isn’t a scene that I know much about, by the way.

2. Also, Olympia took this label seriously. So much so that God sent an earthquake seven months later, destroying many a hip thing in Olympia. That’s not actually true, though God does disprove of Olympia taking itself too seriously.

But, that’s the point, isn’t it? We take this label too damn seriously today. And, as soon as you start taking a label of hip seriously, does it now make you unhip?

Some various links of people taking the label seriously:
I use it here.
Bad Nazis can’t come to the hippest town in the West, can they?

The most extreme example I can think of this is The Sitting Duck, the local version of an alternative newspaper, which from my memory came around about the time Ben made his proclamation. They feature a tag line at the top of each paper, which today is “featuring the bubbliest writers in the West.” I’m not sure if they’re sinning by taking the hippest label to seriously or not seriously enough, therefore taking it seriously.

Basically, what I’m saying is that by the summer of 2010 I’d like to see Olympia forget about being the hippest town in the West. Ten years is enough and over a year and a half is enough time for us to prepare to stop using the phrase.

Also, by now, eight years after the fact, I’m sure some other town has usurped us in hipness.

Olympia neighborhoods, which ones are community friendly?

Over at Olyblog, we’re sort of talking about the recent election and why some neighborhoods voted one way. Former city council member Matthew Green posted up and gave a great comment. He fell apart in my mind when he said that SE Olympia lacks community because of the lack of small community businesses.

This may be a circular argument, but SE Oly lacks small businesses because it lacks the zoning for these sorts of businesses. If the city wanted small community shops down here, they could have designed them in.

Here’s what I’m talking about.

Northeast Olympia


The only color to pay attention to here is green. In this map, the green colors represent the Puget Pantry (middle of the map), the San Francisco Bakery and a corner store (both towards the top).

Northwest Olympia
This area includes the Harrison commercial area, but also the west side Food Co-op is located right in the middle of a neighborhood. Also, notice the gray zoning along the water, which is mixed use commercial.

Southeast Olympia

Two maps for this side of town, so its an even more startling example of homogeneous zoning that excludes the kind of small local businesses that Matt was talking about. Up on the north side of the top map is the Pit Stop Market, and aside from the Boulevard Nursery, there isn’t another local business on this side of town. Weird that the nursery is actually zoned residential.

So, here’s the question, which comes first: the zoning or the business? Does the zoning come along because someone wants to open a business in a particular location? Or, does the zoning allow a business to be opened? I’d say the second one is more likely in my mind.

If the city were to allow a certain number of businesses to open in residential areas, then maybe we’d see more local businesses in SE Olympia.

Wished I’ve voted againt Bill McGregor for Olympia Port Commission

I voted for him because I couldn’t think of one thing he’d done wrong in his short time on the commission and because I didn’t want to vote for serial candidate Bill Pilkey without a good reason. After seeing this video, I would have voted against him.

I don’t necessarily agree with the activists that wanted to show the video during a port commission meeting, but the over the top hand wringing by Van Schoorl and McGregor was too much.

Seat of government in Oly; actual government not so much

The Puget Sound Partnership, a new state agency, will be located in Tacoma. The only part of the division of state government that will actually be located in Olympia is the headquarters:

…Governor Chris Gregoire today announced that the Puget Sound Partnership will open an office in the City of Tacoma’s Urban Waters marine research center on Thea Foss Waterway. The satellite office will operate in close proximity to Tacoma’s environmental services division labs and UW-Tacoma research labs.

Satellite? Won’t the Tacoma office include the agency’s executive director, and some 30 people?

Yes and yes.

But it appears officials are tip-toeing around a provision of the state constitution that requires the headquarters of state agencies to locate in the capitol. That usually means Olympia, but Tumwater and Lacey qualify, too.

Thus, the “headquarters” of the Puget Sound Partnership will likely remain in Olympia. But only on paper. In this case, the satellite will be larger than the mother ship.

Why the location yoga? Historylink:

Some state agencies began simply drifting away from Olympia; as early as 1899 the Board of Health moved to Seattle. After World War II ended in 1945, the trend of agencies leaving Olympia accelerated. By the mid-1950s, 13 agencies had moved their headquarters to Seattle. Once again the matter ended up in front of the Washington Supreme Court. On August 3, 1954, the Washington State Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that state agencies must headquarter in Olympia. “The decision, a new and stunning climax to the century-long fight by Olympians to be the center of state government, was written by Justice Charles T. Donsworth” (The Daily Olympian). In a 33-page decision, the court wrote: “We feel certain it was the intention of the framers of our state constitution and the people … that the whole of the executive department should be located in the seat of government” (The Daily Olympian).

The case was controversial enough to generate a written dissent. The four dissenting justices argued that the capital question was one for the Legislature, not the court, to decide.

Good legal rundown here.

30 jobs worth suing over? Well, no.

But, what would stop state agencies from leaving northern Thurston County all-together and just keep a one office “headquarters” intact in the state capital? How much of the PSP’s work do you think will actually get done in Olympia?

Re: Nafziger opens up

Ok, this is obviously what Rich Nafziger was talking about.

If you’re into that kind of thing, the comments are one-sided against the Nafziger split on this whole thing:

If Nafziger really said what the Olympian reported, he has no business being on the board. Being a board member means you make REAL decisions and take action, not that you are a rubber stamp for the superintendent. Nafizger wants to just go along and watch, not to lead. Why is he interested in holding public office?

Nafziger opens up

I thought it was interesting when folks were noting that Oly’s Rich Nafziger got a new job in the political hierarchy, that no one noted his blog. That’s too bad, because while Rich often takes months of weeks between posts, when he does get something up, its usually worth the read.

No exception this week (or now at this link or this link I guess):

Olympia is one of the strongest school districts in the State of Washington. Ask the parents, teachers, and community members in Olympia….

But if you ask Board directors Russ Lehman, and Bob Shirley, they will tell you that the district is mediocre at best. They argue that voters should elect the candidates they are working to elect (Jeff Nejedly and Lucy Meltzer), give them a majority and then heads will roll and the district will move forward to excellence.

I worry that if they gain a majority on the board, the Olympia School Board will become the Seattle School Board. A board that is infamous for its negativism, political correctness and disdain for the teachers and other employees of their district.

The post is called “burning down the house” and it doesn’t seem to pull any punches on what Rich thinks of Lehman and Shirley. It seems to be in reaction to this situation in which Lehman and Shirley are asking to start a much needed budget discussion sooner rather than later. But, maybe not, Nafziger never really talks about the budget.

There are two contested school board races this year in Olympia: incumbent Carolyn Barclift is facing off against newcomer Lucy Gentry-Meltzer and Jeff Nejedly and Frank Wilson are facing off for an open seat.

From what I know, Barclift and Wilson are supported by Nafziger and Gentry Meltzer and Nejedly are supported by Lehman and Shirley.

Just for the record, the teacher’s union is supporting Frank Wilson.

On a side note, the local school board is probably one of the more mysterious local government agencies to me. I keep a close eye on the city and the port always seems to be in the news, but its interesting to see so much school board stuff popping up in blogs.

Jason Hearn is a…

Good guy apparently:

Hearn is a good fit for council

Jason Hearn is good for Lacey.

Unlike our neighboring city councils, we in Lacey are blessed with men and women who are making righteous decisions for us every day.

Running for the vacant seat on our city council, Hearn will complement and enhance the family values that our city council already espouses.

Hearn is a good man with a wonderful wife and three young children.

His slogan says it all: “It’s all about Lacey.” He’s got my vote!

Dick Sittler, Lacey

The letter itself doesn’t say anything specific. Lacey is great, Olympia and Tumwater not so great. Hearn would fit in with Lacey, but no specific reason why.

What is specific is the language that Sittler used: blessed… righteous decisions… enhance the family values…

So, Sittler is saying that Hearn is a Christian and that his opponent Russ Olson isn’t. Well, if that’s how they’re choosing city councilmen in Lacey, I don’t know what else to say.

Neighborhood meetings in Douglas County

When residents butt heads with developers in Douglas County, local government may have a solution. Put everyone at the same table and get to work it out:

The building industry has been notorious for using “Private Property Rights” and
“A man should be able to do what ever he wants with his property” clichés. Usually these “Rights” pertain only to the building industry and they are very reluctant to give the same “Rights” to others. They are also Machiavellian in their development plans preferring to avoid any contact with or sharing of information with other property owners and concerned citizens. Apparently for fear that they may have to forfeit some of their precious private property rights while allowing others to assert theirs.

To now expect the building industry to not only communicate with surrounding property owners but also to even ponder the private property rights of others seem like a big jump. Quite possibly if this “Neighborhood Meeting” plan is put into action developers might find that being candid with surrounding property owners and respecting their private property rights will make things a lot easier on everybody.

One of the reasons for the making official of neighborhood associations in Olympia was this kind of push and pull between the city and developers and current residents. The NAs gives the city a one stop shop for where to send information new developments. A cynical person would say that folks who get involved in NAs would most likely be the ones that complain the most to the city, so keeping them involved in an easy way of disarming them and keeping them engaged in a positive way.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Olympia Time

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑