History, politics, people of Oly WA

Author: Emmett O'Connell (Page 124 of 176)

How the Sonics can matter more: Sell us (Part of) the Team

Back in Part 1: eridani said:

The Packers are owned by citizens of the town, and they give way more to their community than most professional sports teams. They don’t even have professional cheerleaders–high school squads from all over Wisconsin take turns at that function.

chadlupkes said:

Sports teams and franchises are for-profit organizations, whose mission is to earn money for their ownership teams, not to provide a good cultural experience to the public.

When the Sonics go non-profit, or allow anyone to own stock and be a stakeholder WITH FINANCIAL RETURNS, then the situation will have changed.

Back in the mid-90s sports owners across the country were heading to their local governments, hat in hand, looking for money to build new stadiums. Many citizens looked at the pocket books of their owners and thought “Wouldn’t it be great if we were more like the Green Bay Packers?”

The Packers, even though they’re a for profit corporation the same as any for profit corporation, are unique in professionals sports because they offer stock to anyone who wants to come along. The sort of person who is most interested in buying Packers stock, is of course, a fan of the Packers. This model has kept a highly successful sports franchise in a community, that frankly, doesn’t deserve one from the truly economic way of looking at the sport.

Even Green Bay’s Wisconsin Big Brother, Milwaukee, has had trouble holding onto sports teams: the the Hawks of the NBA and the Braves of MLB have all passed through and left Milwaukee in the time that the Packers have played. Turns out though that every other community interested in keeping an NBA, MLB, NFL or NHL team in town through some kind of corporate stock arrangement or non-profit ownership is pretty much out of luck. All four leagues outlaw non-profit ownership, with the NFL going as far as to ban any sort of corporate ownership, to prevent another Packers.

The New Rules Project points to several other non-traditional ownership models (in minor league baseball) and there are several non-profit examples in Canadian football (here, here and here).

New Rules also points to several legislative fixes that never actually came through during the high times of community ownership discussion in the late 90s. They go as far as condemning a sports franchise (in Minnsesota and New York) to simply building and running stadiums as a public agency, rather than handing them over to the teams (in Pennsylvania).

There are also examples of national legislation to rebalance the playing fields for locals: Sen. Paul Wellstone suggested removing baseball’s anti-trust exemption in 2001 and Oregon’s Rep. Earl Blumenauer sponsored the Give Fans a Chance Act, which would have opened the door for community’s to bid on their teams. Rep. Adam Smith was one of the original co-sponsors of the bill.

Simply that the four major sports don’t allow for ownership that would tie a team to their community is the most maddening part of this. Each league is exempt from anti-trust laws because their industry is not considered “commerce” by the courts, so they have the ability to ban non-profit ownership.

What I haven’t pointed out yet is that the NBA does not ban corporate ownership, just non-profit ownership.

So, a Packers solution, a for profit company that sells stock on an individual basis, is technically possible here.

The problem is history. Green Bay has always been an individual stock company, from its origins. Its been when the team needed to raise money that they sold more stock.

Huh, that gives one of thought though, doesn’t it? How would the Sonics feel if we told them that they could have all the money they wanted for a new arena if that money was raised by selling stock in a new ownership interest in the Sonics? We wouldn’t buy the Sonics outright, just a portion. Just to get something back for our investment. The people would finance this particular improvement in the Sonics, but for every dollar we put into a new arena, we would also get a dollar in the ownership of the franchise.

I don’t know why this wouldn’t work.

Campillo for long relief

The Mariners are trying to sort out their long reliever situation:

That’s a competition among Sean Green, Sean White and Jon Huber and it may not be decided until the final few days before the opener. White has the advantage of being a Rule 5 draft pick who must be offered back to the Atlanta Braves if he doesn’t make the 25-man roster.

If you compare the four of these guys, Campillo comes in second to White in two categories that matter in spring training, innings (10 for White, 8 for Campillo) and ERA (1.80 for White, 6.75 for Campillo). Though Campillo’s ERA has dropped since two disastrous outings where it topped almost 20. So, I understand if they’d keep White on, especially given his Rule 5 status.

Campillo has at least made the argument, including this two innings today with only one hit and one walk in relief, that he deserves a roster spot. Since March 8, where he gave up five runs in an inning, he hasn’t given up more than a single hit in an outing, let alone a run. I’m just surprised he’s gone so long without getting any attention.

Dennis Kucinich coming to Olympia (March 30th)

The first presidential candidate I ever saw live (the second was Bill Richardson) is coming to Olympia again. Via email:

America In Solidarity is proud to host Congressman Dennis Kucinich for two events as he tours the United States in support of his nomination to be President. The Ohio Democrat was one of our original pledge signers and spoke at our original kickoff in 2003. Dennis is a union member, a tireless advocate for workers’ rights, and a visionary thinker with great ideas for how to improve the lives of ordinary Americans.

He was against the war in Iraq from the beginning and has consistently championed the interests of workers since his arrival in Washington, D.C. We are proud to have him on our side, representing the views of countless Americans whose voices have been entirely left out of the corporate media

There will be two opportunities for you to come and meet him. The first will be at Olympia’s Traditions Cafe on Friday March 30th.

Come out and talk with one of America’s great progressive leaders from 4:30pm-5:30pm in Olympia.

Traditions Cafe and World Folk Art
300 5th Ave SW
Olympia, WA
United States

We will also be hosting a rally for Dennis on Sunday, April 1st in Seattle from 6pm to 7:30 PM at the Labor Temple, located at 2800 1st Ave.
For any additional information, call our office at 253-471-1123.

England and open source, social media, etc…

I’ve always been impressed with the way that England seems to be way ahead of the curve in terms of applying the power of the web to the way government deliberates. Blogging of course has had a big impact on politics here, but more on the side of campaigning, not governing. There is a huge difference.

Look at the local e-democracy national project, how Britons can petition their prime minister, and now a speech by a conservative politician on Open Source Politics. I love his three pillars:

The first of these pillars is about equality – equality of information – or what Eric Schmidt, Chief Executive of Google, called “the democratisation of access to information” when he spoke to our Party Conference.

The second pillar of a new political settlement will be founded on new social networks.

The final pillar of this new political settlement is open source.

Last week I went to hear my friend Professor Jeff Sachs deliver the first Reith Lecture. He talked about open source politics.

Open source politics means rejecting the old monolithic top-down approach to decision-making.

It means throwing open the doors and listening to new ideas and new contributors.

It means harnessing the power of mass collaboration.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Olympia Time

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑