History, politics, people of Oly WA

Author: Emmett O'Connell (Page 32 of 177)

Almost an hour of viewing on Olympia (Olyblogosphere for June 16, 2014)

1. This is a local blog, but not a local topic. Actually, its a pretty universal topic, but one that specifically refers to the D-Day anniversary. Mathias writes about history, and how we grow from it. Wonderful stuff.

2. Didn’t you want to watch a 22 minute mini-documentary about SPSCC Basketball? You sure did. Its actually not too bad.

3. And, if that wasn’t enough, a 30-minute web video on this season in Watershed Park.

4. Via Thad at Olyblog, the Olympia Food Co-op opens up about the entire not buying stuff from Israel topic. Which is like all of one product? Olive oil, right? 

Part 1: Overview
Part 2: Boycott FAQ
Part 3: Lawsuit FAQ

5.  And, from the Olympia flickr pool: Historic Alleyway.

Framing my own personal candidate questionnaire on internet access and court records

I like it when organizations send questions to candidates. Its a nice way to get them down on paper taking positions that they aren’t likely bringing up on their own.I’ve though for awhile about putting together my own questionnaire, and two big areas seemed to pop out at me, PUDs and the internet and court records.

So, what I’m going to do is send these questions off to candidates and then, when I get some responses back, I’ll post those.

Here’s the question (or something similar) that I’m going to send to Public Utility District and legislative candidates. It is framed around the ideas I wrote about here.

1. PUDs are allowed by law to become wholesale internet service providers.
With the already limited number of private companies providing internet
access abandoning net nuetrality, we have the opportunity through our
PUDs to help provide inexpensive and fair access.

Do you think
the Thurston PUD should enter the broadband market? Also, do you think
the state legislature should lift the ban of PUDs selling internet
access direct to customers?

Here’s the question that I’m going to send to legislative candidates and the two candidates for county clerk. I’ve written more on this topic here.

2. Court records are understood by common law to be public records. While they aren’t specifically considered under Washington State’s public records act, they are as important as any public document. 

Despite this, the cost to citizens to obtain copies of court records is prohibitive. For example, it costs nearly $30 for an electronic copy of a 16 page document. This is well above what would be considered reasonable for a similar document from any other part of government.

Should the legislature allow counties to charge the same amount for any public document, including court records?

Knute Berger, it isn’t hypocrisy, it’s a competition of political visions

Knute Berger is usually right.

Usually.


But, not on this one:

Our current self-image is wrapped around the idea that we’re better than other people, that we’re more idealistic, more humane, more fair. Some of that is pure snobbery.

Some of it is idealism, a genuine desire to do good and do better.
Mayor Ed Murray has said that he wants Seattle to be a role model for
progressivism in the world, and the mayors before him, Mike McGinn and
Greg Nickels, were largely on board with a similar agenda. But to
accomplish that, we’d have to get a whole lot better at looking at the
real costs and true values of all those economic engines we embrace.
It’s time to reconsider our corporate heroes in a fresh light.

Berger is trying to point out that Seattle (or I think more accurately, urban Puget Sound… Pugetopolis, maybe…) says one thing but does another. While we fight for a $15 minimum wage, fight gravel mines in our back yard (and mines in Alaska), we roll over for Amazon and Boeing. We talk a nice game, but when it comes down to it, we’re a bunch of corporate whores.

Sure, people are hypocrites. No one really lives in truth all the time. That’s like saying the sun rises. But, pointing out hypocrisy hardly makes a good column.

In this case, Berger is being overly simplistic. Seattle (Pugetopolis and even Cascadia) is more diverse than he gives us credit for.

And, one of the deepest caverns of political difference in Pugetopolis (if you don’t mind) is how we approach corporations. Back to the founding of our greater region of Cascadia, the issue of corporate power has divided us. It shaped the very founding document of Oregon, played a large part in early drafts of the Washington constitution and drove the history of entire cities. The early battles between Seattle and Tacoma often took the shape of battles between railroad companies.

At the founding of our region, there were two competing mindsets on corporate power and society. One from New England was very pro-industry and pro-corporation. The other, from the upper Ohio Valley and Appalachia was very nervous about the power of companies over communities.

These competing visions were the reasons they debated corporations during the Oregon constitutional convention. Its also why Berger can see hypocrisy in Puget Sound, when really what he’s seeing is a century plus old political debate.

And, with any political debate, where the support is nearly evenly split, each side takes turns winning the day. When we raise the minimum wage its our anti-corporate (and anti-slave and anti-slavery) Appalachian history winning. When we give Boeing massive tax breaks, its our New England capitalistic history taking over.

And, these New England/Appalachian divides don’t often follow modern political divisions, you can have Democrats acting like corporatists and you can have Republicans taking shots at Boeing.

When it looks like we’re talking two different games, it is just our single regional identity working through one its largest issues, how we treaty corporations.

Working draft of “Cascadia Exists,” the book I’ll hopefully finish on our region next fall

I’ve been blogging on the Cascadia exists label for the past year or so. The point of the blogging was to examine Cascadia as it exists right now. Also, to point out like other well-defined American regions, how this regions really does stand out now.

I’ve taken a look at our politics, if we have a regional mood (we do, Cascadia Calm) and the unique way we approach religion.

These aren’t a ton of posts, but they’re beginning to form around four general ideas: religion, politics, personality and culture. So, what I’m going to try to do over the next few months is stitch together these pieces into a short ebook.

I’ve posted an editable version of the book online, so if you feel like it, give me a hand. Or, just give me your thoughts. I’ll try to include as many thoughts as possible in the finished product.

Shores, truth, passion and cans of all sizes (Olyblogosphere for June 2, 2014)

1. Along the Shores of Puget Sound by “Bees, Birds and Butterflies.” I have a different opinion about the SEAA, but overall, good post right here.

2. This isn’t a very interesting blog post, but this is a very interesting blog. Or, it could be, if it grew beyond the one post. Homelessness is a big deal here in Olympia. It is nice to see someone putting the effort in to cover like this.

3. A local teacher tells us not everyone needs a four year degree. That’s a very true thing. Not everyone needs a cup of coffee, but everyone does need to wake up. Everyone needs to find something true for their lives, it just isn’t always with a mortarboard.

4. I’ll admit, Shipwreck Beads and crafting in general is something I don’t get. But, Jill of All Trades gets both things, so in recognition of her passion and skill, here’s a link to a mystery to me.

5. My god. I never knew this. One of the garbage cans down at the falls park is a mother-loving Olympia can.  When did this happen?

What made this economic recovery in Washington State different than the early 1990s and 2000s?



 In both the early 1990s and early 2000s, Washington State lagged the country in economic recovery. At least in terms of unemployment. But, you can see the curve of dipping unemployment this time around, Washington State matched or beat the jobless rate dip, especially in the past two years.

So, what was different this time around? Some folks (a year ago) pointed out that our trade dependent nature would benefit the state, allowing us to lead the nation out of recession. But, wasn’t this true in the 1990s and 2000s. Boeing and other trade dependent industries (natural resources, shipping, farming) still dominated then too right?

Either way, the employment recovery looked different this time around. I’m curious why.

On Memorial Day, memorialize the Puget Sound War

February 1861

After the treaties were signed around here, settling outstanding tribal land claims, and legally opening settlement in our region, we went to war. The terms of the treaties didn’t match up with the expectations of the tribes. The small non-native communities contracted into bunkhouses. Hundreds formed units to both defend their farms and towns and to seek out Indians to kill.

Eventually, the Puget Sound War petered out, Indian leaders were tried, hung and murdered.

But, most importantly to the civil leaders here, we had spent money. Someone needed to pay.

The debate over the war debt of the Puget Sound War is an interesting one that gets to the nature of our early settlement here.

If it was a war, then Indian leaders like Leschi should not have been hung for murder in the years after the conflict. You can’t commit murder if you’re a soldier in a war.

Also, if it was a war, roving bands of whites should not have spent the years following the war looking for Indians to kill, carrying writs from local courts. Certain judges apparently thought the Puget Sound War wasn’t a war, or else there wouldn’t be murderers. Just veterans.

But, the instructions given to our congressional delegate Issac Stevens (who as governor led the war effort) in the late 1850s was to get federal repayment for our war debts. It was a war.

The Senate acknowledged the existence of a war, when they eventually passed $3 million appropriate in 1861. Obviously, that money was needed for another war.

Its funny that that war, had a similar post war debate. Should the leader of the confederacy be tried? Was the Civil War a real war? If they were leaders of a real nation, then of course not. You can’t put a national executive on trial for leading his country in war. But, if they were merely terrorist leaders, taking charge illegally of a portion of a whole country, then of course, put them on trial.

Obviously, if we zero in on the case of Jefferson Davis (the President of the apparent Confederate States) we see a lot of nuance. If he’s on trial, what happens if the federal government gets a bad result? He’s found innocent? The constitutionality of secession is secured? In the end, it was better to just release him and leave the questions unanswered.

But, because Jefferson Davis didn’t join Leschi at the gallows, the Civil War was a war. Leschi was the Indian symbol to white Americans of the tribal cause. He was hung because there were enough people in charge in the territory that couldn’t fathom him being anything other than a murderer. But, in their own split minds, they saw their service as soldiers. So, they sent Stevens to congress to get money for war debts.

It wasn’t until 1875 that the federal government really got around to putting the war stamp on the Puget Sound War, when they spent a much smaller sum ($50,000) to put the war debts to bed.

We really did have a war it. It was asymmetrical. It wasn’t pretty. We don’t have battlefield sites, instead we have gallows and blockhouse sites. And, for years people here and far away didn’t agree it really existed.

And, ten years ago, during the trial in which the historical court exonerated Leschi, lawyers asked Captain Paul Robson why the U.S. Army thought Leschi shouldn’t have been hung. Because, we don’t hang soldiers.

The Thurston County PUD, local internet, net neutrality and the next fight

A little while back a group of citizens took on Puget Sound Energy to bring power to the people. Literally, they wanted to have our local public utility district, which up to now is limited to providing water to a small portion of the county, into the electricity business.

They lost. Big.

Despite a horrific record of bringing the county back online after a winter storm months before, the public electricity drive was outspent and lost at the polls. I voted yes. I like the idea of public power.

But, the entire time I thought that maybe they were fighting the last campaign. Seriously, public power is an old issue.

What is the next issue that is like what electricity was in the 1930s through the 1950s? The internet.

Right now, we’re seeing internet service providers show why there’s a massive difference between the values corporations bring, compared to government. Or, businesses that are required to support the public trust.

Net neutrality, providing equal access to all data, not discriminating based on the content providers ability to pay, is like the electrical access issue of the 1930s. And, watching the tiered internet we now seeing created, the public in Washington State can seem to provide their own home grown version of net neutrality.

Public utility districts have been able to for years get into the broadband business. Right now they can become wholesale providers to local companies that provide their own retail plugins. This isn’t ideal, but at least it gets us part of the way there. I would assume that local PUDs could write net neutrality into their contracts. Or, if a certain bill passed, PUDs could get directly into the retail business and ensure net neutrality.

There seems to be a lot of room in this discussion. Maybe even the cities could join with the PUD:


Still, the city of Edmonds was forced to seek a state attorney
general’s opinion in 2003 to offer broadband as a public service. In
response to Rep. Jeff Morris of the 40th District, the attorney general
said “First-class and code cities and charter counties may offer
telecommunications services to their residents to the extent not
specifically barred by state statute.”

Lacey, Olympia and Tumwater have all laid fiber optics in
city-owned conduits covering varying proportions of each jurisdiction,
which they use primarily for internal data and communications. And all
three cities share access with the state Department of Transportation.

By extending fiber optic networks throughout the metro area,
the three cities could open their infrastructure to private companies
and, in turn, provide equitable Internet access to families wanting to
Skype with loved ones across the country, or download a movie on family
night.

One last way local governments could ensure equal access would be through free public wifi. The Kitsap PUD has already deployed local free wifi in Poulsbo. Wifi is also a way to get around the direct access to the public barrier PUDs have experienced:

…the state legislature erected barriers that derailed the full
project by revoking PUD authority to offer direct retail services. To
this day, public utility districts are required to wholesale access,
which rarely creates enough revenue to justify the initial cost of
building networks. Community leaders knew that wholesale-only models
carry more risk because they split an already tight revenue stream. With
the change in state law, the community re-evaluated the fiber network
plan.

Rather than abandon the plan, Poulsbo and the PUD adjusted it to use
the existing fiber assets. They created the wireless mesh pilot project
that went live in Poulsbo in November 2012. They funded the project with
a Local Improvement District (LID) loan from the State of Washington.
LID works with specific geographic areas; the neighbors in an area
collaborate to form each district. The City heads up the project by
handling the design, financing, and construction of the improvements,
selling bonds for financing. The property owners in the geographic area
payback the bonds through special assessments over 10 or 20 years.

From what I can tell from meeting minutes from last year, the Thurston PUD has been looking into broadband. No recent updates though.

I think the PUD should go back out and try to expand their services beyond water. I think they should work with the cities, build broadband and start putting up wifi antennas. The next find isn’t power, the next fight is information. The internet is a basic right, it should be a public resource, it should be fair and the Thurston PUD can help that happen. 


Read more here: http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2014/05/08/3630479/could-local-cities-provide-equitable.html#storylink=cpy

What was going on in Olympia 30 years ago?

Local arts activists lobbied for and built the Washington Center for the Performing Arts.

Local athletic boosters brought arguably the largest sporting event ever to Olympia.

Local political activists changed the government at city hall.

The first part of the 1980s was a big time in Olympia. Things were happening, people were getting things done. But, why?

I might just be cherry picking historical events, pointing to them and saying “hey look, something was different here,” so correct me if I’m wrong. But, it really does seem that those years in the early 1980s were a time when things changed around here.

One simple reason could have been the influx of new residents in Thurston County. If you look at Olympia’s population alone, the early 1980s was a time of steady growth. But, in broader Thurston County, population took off in the 1970s.

This population increase must have had an impact on our local culture. I wouldn’t assume a fundamental change, but certainly making people and organizations more active, more open to change and new projects.

Now, I’m just spit-balling, but I’d assume that a bunch of these new residents came to take state jobs. I’ve read that state government (during the Dan Evans administration) expanded greatly in the 1970s, taking on more roles. And, because of a 1950s era lawsuit, much of this growth took place in Thurston County.

These are mostly notes to a new inquiry. But, if someone were to write a new history of Thurston County, focusing on the 1970s and 80s might be a nice time to highlight.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Olympia Time

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑